Clifton O Boyd Jr | The Right Fitness Center - What to Consider

This is a service that offers its clients a place that has exercise equipment for the purpose of getting personally fit The subscriptions of these fitness centers can be as inexpensive as $10 a month or as much as $700 a year. It depends on the place of the center and the amenities and equipment offered. When you are choosing a fitness center there are many things that you should consider before creating your final decision.

One of the main things that you should think about is your level of comfort. The reasons this is important is that if you are self aware or unpleasant about working out then you are most likely not going to stay motivated to go on a frequent basis. When it comes to your level of comfortableness with the fitness center, there are also other issues to think about. You should make sure that the center is well lit and clean, that it has the state of the art equipment and is it in good repair. Is there an trainer to show you in how to use the different pieces of equipment properly? You are going to a fitness center to get fit and healthy and balanced so it is important that you know how to maximize the benefits from the different pieces of equipment. You also need to make sure that there are personal, clean bathrooms and restrooms.

Another important concern is the location. You want to make sure that it is conveniently located near your home because no one wants to drive twenty miles or so to a health and fitness center. You want to be sure that it is located in an area that is secure and well lit, especially if they offer early morning or late night hours. Examine to see if they have a decent size vehicle parking lot and that it is also well lit.

Another key factor is the accessibility or the hours that the middle is open. No one works the same hours nor has the same hours that can go to the health and fitness center so the hours open need to fit your schedule. Some fitness centers today are open twenty-four hours a day seven days a week but still have specific hours that they will be open and have instructors in the center. To implement the center after those hours you will to have a pass card, like a hotel uses, in order to get into the fitness center. For these types of centers, it is very significant that the parking is close to the developing and the parking lot is very well lit. The last two factors is the cost per month or year and if the center offers any fitness sessions.

Clifton O Boyd Jr | What's the Best Exercise Plan for Functional training

Clifton O. Boyd Jr. is a professional with knowledge on Team Building Coaching, Sales Management and Fitness Marketing. Working at Retro Fitness for more than 4 years as a General Manager, he helps the brand expand while providing an excellent opportunity for investors and gym-goers alike.

The company is a rapidly growing fitness brand based in Neptune City, New Jersey. The brand has around 150 locations in 16 states and wants to reach the year of 2020 with 700 locations across the country. Before that, Clifton O. Boyd Jr. worked as a Facility Manager at TEAM Schools: A KIPP Region for 3 years, from 2004 to 2007. Clifton O. Boyd Jr. is also a CPR Certified professional, with experience in Nutrition, Wellness, Sports, athletics and strength training.               

Clifton O. Boyd Jr. knows that functional training is not for anyone. The basics of the training revolves around a better life, with healthier choices and exercises that are made to move and improve the strength of your whole body. This is not just another gym training. 

What is functional training?

Functional training is the type of training that focuses on your entire body, making the muscles work together as they were designed to do. It is not centered in one area or muscle, like conventional weight training, but in many different activities that your body need to do to stay strong and balanced by using more primal movements that will require your muscles to work in harmony.

Clifton O. Boyd Jr says that the principal idea behind functional training is to do more natural exercises that will blend and carry over into daily life. The training will activate muscles that aren’t normally in focus, what will consume more energy. These exercises are multidimensional, working with 3 different planes: the Sagittal, that moves forward, back, up and down and it is commonly used in exercises; the Frontal plane that goes from side to side; and the Transverse plane that is the rotational one. With a workout that moves all 3 planes, is to improve the natural movement skills that you have and boost your general mobility.

Some of the issues or pain in the muscles come from the fact that the conventional weight training require the use of muscles in a way that is not natural for it to contract or move. This is also a reason for so many injuries when you least expect it.

Therefore, in Clifton O. Boyd Jr. opinion, functional exercises is challenging the balance and coordination and improve your strength and range of motion. It is a training that you do to improve your life and not for the summer time or some event.

Clifton O Boyd Jr | Cancer fear-mongering has got to stop

Imagine what a typical American might do for breakfast: Fry a few slices of bacon, slather Nutella on a piece of toast, and pour a hot cup of coffee while checking e-mail on a smartphone. If we are to believe everything we read in the news, then that rather common daily ritual could cause you to die from cancer.

Nutella, a chocolate hazelnut spread, was the latest victim in the ceaseless fear-mongering over food. Outrageous headlines went viral on the Internet. The Daily Mail breathlessly shouted, “Could Nutella give you CANCER?” while Quartz wrote, “Stores Are Pulling Nutella After Report Links It To Cancer” — later corrected because initial reports by the BBC and other outlets were wrong.

These stories give “fake news” a bad name. They are an embarrassment to journalism and a dereliction of duty. Once again, the media simply copied and pasted what other outlets reported, and few if any major news organizations did their jobs properly by reading the original scientific report.

The original study was produced by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The study wasn’t even about Nutella. Instead, it examined how many potentially cancer-causing contaminants existed in food products that contain palm and other oils (very common ingredients), and then it estimated how much people ate in their diets.

Its conclusion was rather boring: Most adults don’t eat enough of these contaminants to raise any health concerns. Infants and children consume more of these contaminants than adults, but their exposure level is still very far below what scientific studies have shown to be potentially dangerous in lab rats.

Additionally, the palm oil in Nutella isn’t even the primary or biggest source of these contaminants in the average diet. Baby formula, cookies, pastries, cakes, potatoes, and margarine all contain these contaminants.

Moreover, there is no epidemiological evidence linking palm oil to cancer in humans. On the contrary, the tocotrienols present in palm and other oils could conceivably prevent cancer. And finally, the company that makes Nutella said it doesn't refine its palm oil at the high temperatures the study said increased risk.

Nutrition research is often flimsy, and headlines reporting on them are generally over-simplified and hyperbolic. Bacon? Burnt toast? Hot water? Coffee? Wi-fi? Cell phones? Somebody, somewhere, has made a dubious claim linking each of them to cancer.

Unfortunately, it’s precisely this sort of “blame-and-claim” compensation culture, encouraged by lawyers and facilitated by a general lack of scientific understanding, that results in ludicrous jackpot verdicts, such as the one that awarded $70 million to a woman based on the erroneous belief that baby powder causes ovarian cancer.

Additionally, fear-mongering inevitably results in the “Chicken Little” effect. If people are told that everything causes cancer, they will tune out. To perform a true public service, the media ought to be in the business of separating health scares from health threats.

Continuing to conflate the two does nothing other than undermine people’s faith in evidence based science and public health. Read More..